BREAKING: Meta stock, $META, surges over +5% after the company agrees to pay up to $16.7 billion to settle claims that Facebook and Instagram harmed children. x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/20…
· 911K Views
Back to @KobeissiLetter
BREAKING: Meta stock, $META, surges over +5% after the company agrees to pay up to $16.7 billion to settle claims that Facebook and Instagram harmed children. x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/20…
· 911K Views
@KobeissiLetter Watch raw computer junk literally melt down into a beautiful, glowing gold bar! Click the link right now to view this highly satisfying tech transformation video: x.com/i/status/209259778358059…
@KobeissiLetter This was a great perspective. Always valuable to hear different approaches to the same market. @GwenPoth is another good follow.
@KobeissiLetter Meta getting a $16.7B settlement and still pumping 5%+ is wild. Markets really do price the future, not the headline. 👀📈
@KobeissiLetter Green or red by the close today? @Leeshhh_ how are you reading the market?
@KobeissiLetter Can’t think of any company that has damaged the social fabric of humanity half as much
@KobeissiLetter Appreciate your thoughts here. Your analysis feels grounded and experienced. You and @RexWiggins12 are two finance accounts I respect.
@KobeissiLetter So they admitted the product harms children and teenagers yet the stock price is rallying. Ok. Makes sense
@KobeissiLetter Can’t confirm the $16.7B figure sources only show Meta and states “discussing” a settlement as of yesterday, no dollar amount agreed. Also, your own chart shows +1.97%, not +5%, so this looks premature or exaggerated.
@KobeissiLetter That kind of headline pop usually runs into dealer sells at the 620+ call wall. $META can stretch a bit, but the real test is whether bids hold the gap up through the afternoon.
@KobeissiLetter What in the settlement terms made investors treat a sizable cash payment as a positive catalyst for Meta?
@KobeissiLetter Settling claims is basically an admission of guilt, right?
@KobeissiLetter Legal overhang cleared, next stop new all-time highs $META 🚀
@KobeissiLetter Not only will they have to settle but real changes coming to Zuck's META which will have lasting impacts on the growth of this company
@KobeissiLetter Cost $17b. Gains $70b in market cap. Thats not justice
@KobeissiLetter We harm children but it’s gonna cost less money to settle the case!
@KobeissiLetter 🇶🇦 Qatar has become one of the biggest economic casualties of the U.S.-Iran war, It’s LNG exports collapsed by 96% after six months into the conflict. x.com/FlashWireNews/status/209…
@KobeissiLetter Pay to make it go away, stock goes up. wild.
@KobeissiLetter High ranking meta employees forbade their children from using the app long before the lawsuit, they knew the harm and addiction they were exposing children to while actively facilitating it
@KobeissiLetter Here we go. The 1.4t charges in the bin and $META to the moon. Once again the headline fears are never that worse as they appear
@KobeissiLetter Settlement was the most likely outcome. Otherwise, you open Pandora's box. So many websites and apps would be sued.
The market reaction is what I find most interesting here. A potential $16.7B settlement sounds massive, yet $META is up more than 5%. That suggests investors may view the financial impact as manageable relative to Meta’s cash flow and earnings power. The bigger question: Is the market underestimating the long-term regulatory risk?
@KobeissiLetter +$5% on a potential $16.7B bill tells you how ugly the tail risk was. The 29-state case had exposure approaching $200B, so investors are effectively paying up to cap the liability. Expensive settlement, cheaper uncertainty.
@KobeissiLetter People are conditioned to think that settlements like this are appropriate If people were injured and government wants to make a case against them then the government should be taking those charges to trial. Settlements aren't justice
The market is cheering the settlement not because $16.7B is cheap, but because it caps a $1.4T existential tail risk that was hanging over the stock. Removing that nuclear option and turning it into a one-time, quantifiable cost allows investors to refocus on the core business. Now the real test begins: can Meta grow its way through this without further regulatory overhang?
@KobeissiLetter Reading this whole sentence hurts. @grok how much does this increase Mark Zuckerberg’s wealth?
@KobeissiLetter Markets much prefer certainty to uncertainty no matter the price tag!
@KobeissiLetter The +5% reaction assumes the $16.7 billion cap fully resolves litigation risk. Confirmation requires seeing whether remaining claims exceed that threshold.
@KobeissiLetter $16.7B sounds catastrophic until you realize the stock was already pricing in existential risk. Now it's just a number on a balance sheet. Clarity always wins over uncertainty.
@KobeissiLetter Childeren dont have to use those platform, they chose to use it. I cant see why this is the respnsibility of meta.
7 replies whose parent comment X withheld
@archivesincompl @KobeissiLetter I suppose if you've got $16.7B lying around, you can silence everyone and just move on
@ChrisG_XT @KobeissiLetter Not questioning that. From expenditure standpoint it´s positive. Even though it was obvious that they would never pay $1T or ANYTHING close to that value.
@DustdrifterX @Crypto_LoftPig @KobeissiLetter Let me ask you a question. If you knew your claims against META had any credibility and that they could pay up to $1.4T in damages, would you settle for $16B?
@snarkycentrst @Crypto_LoftPig @KobeissiLetter Me personally? sure i don't have money to pay lawyers for dragged trial... but this were states so who knows what their dynamics would be, I sure don't
@socknug @KobeissiLetter like 10% of last year's profits but the point still stands, why would a stock rise when they agree to paying a fine
These were collected in full; the comment they answer was not returned by X.