Post

@HadickM And filter out anything that is AI-probable above a user-specified threshhold

@HadickM kinda weird take. anon accounts usually are the ones that share alpha because doxxed people tweet for the sake of marketing themselves or their biz forced doxxing is a sin

@HadickM countless high value anon accounts. countless low value facer accounts. you're stretching for some correlation here that doesn't exist

@HadickM Anon accounts are the whole point for a lot of people though Killing that would gut half the platform

What about something with zk where in your profile you state who you are and credentials and then there’s a way to verify without disclosing name? And then user can set threshold of credentials to allow comments? “Allow only people with 3yrs of crypto experience who actually read my post comment on it”

@HadickM @cobie losing a top tier follower

@HadickM Can I interest you in linkedin? Some of the best alpha comes from anon account, not just on X, same goes for e.g. github. Most of us are pseudo anons anyway. I have also met many of the "anon" accounts, not much difference when there is full name behind them

@HadickM I cannot agree more

@HadickM Ah - the good ol' "open yourself to wrench attacks to earn some internet clout from VC's" gambit. Come on Rob - I thought you were a serious person.

@HadickM Yeah that policy has made LinkedIn the bastion of free flowing debate

@HadickM I’d pay for that extra monthly as a premium feature @elonmusk

@HadickM it's called linkedin and it's the worst thing that's come out of the internet that's what you want so you get the praise and fluff you desire btw u look like a serial killer x.com/Brian_A_E/status/2089063…

@HadickM Nft bros in shambles

@HadickM even @gwern?

@HadickM I love you Rob but this is a boomer take

@HadickM the entire platform runs on anon accounts generating the engagement that keeps it alive. taking that away kills the fire, not just the noise

@HadickM you belong on linkedin

@HadickM sir

@HadickM As someone who has been pressured by VCs and bosses to not post truthful takes on Twitter because it would be bad for their bags, it’s important to maintain anon accounts - they also are often the highest signal if you know how to diligence

@HadickM I really hate those idiots

@HadickM Go private?

@HadickM sounds like X on @worldnetwork

@HadickM Is that why you skipped BTC early on, so now resort to farming LP fees as a back up?

@HadickM In 99% of cases, anons are just cowards

@HadickM @dunleavy89 You know you work in crypto, right?

@HadickM Dumb take. Plenty of people need to be anonymous for fear of repercussions. The founders wrote under pen names. Were they cowards?

@HadickM Go back to linkdin then. This place is for permissionless zk debate. Most of this dying site is for bots anyways, and you don’t have to engage with anon humans who disrespect you, you can block them. This will never be a collaborative, productive website. Stop whining.

@HadickM ah yes, the polymarket investor

@HadickM Many topics require anonymity for safety

@HadickM x.com/Ehcube2001/status/208919…

@HadickM anons built this industry.

@HadickM the honest answer is that anonymity just hides the worst behavior, not prevents it. real accountability comes from being known, even if you can't get rid of anons altogether

@HadickM I agree