Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to @buffett_taro

バ buffett_taro
バフェット太郎
@buffett_taro

【速報】7月雇用統計 <非農業部門雇用者数> 結果:ー2.3万人 予想:+8.5万人 <失業率> 結果:4.1% 予想:4.2% <平均時給(前年比)> 結果:+3.2% 予想:+3.5% <平均時給(前月比)> 結果:+0.1% 予想:+0.3%

· 68K Views

21 Reposts 5 Quotes 154 Likes 4 Bookmarks
replies reposts likes
6 replies collected of 24 X reports

@buffett_taro NFP is unexpectedly in the negative... The market will have to decide whether to price in a slowdown in the economy or expectations of interest rate cuts more strongly.

original · ja

@buffett_taro NFPがまさかのマイナス…。市場は『景気減速』と『利下げ期待』のどちらを強く織り込むかですね

2
バフェット太郎 @buffett_taro · 364K B

Long-term interest rates fell as expectations of interest rate hikes receded, and stocks and gold rose.

original · ja

利上げ観測の後退で長期金利は低下し、株式と金は上昇

1 39
ダイク@投資家 @dai_taiiku0508 ·

@buffett_taro Hmm 😅 I'm hoping for an interest rate cut! I'm looking forward to seeing what happens in the US market after this.

original · ja

@buffett_taro むむ😅利下げ期待!この後の米国市場が楽しみ

田淵一真@XAUUSD/USDJPY @kazutrade6 · D

While the negative NFP figures are certainly eye-catching, we shouldn't overlook the slowdown in average hourly earnings. A month-on-month increase of +0.1% is a clear slowdown, suggesting that wage inflationary pressures are easing. With both employment and wages weak, it's natural that expectations of a Fed interest rate hike are receding. The market's reaction to lower interest rates and a weaker dollar likely reflects this wage weakness.

original · ja

NFPのマイナスに目が行きますが、実は平均時給の鈍化も見逃せませんね。前月比+0.1%は明確な減速で、賃金インフレの圧力が和らいでいることを示唆します。雇用も賃金も弱いとなれば、FRBの利上げ観測が後退するのは自然な流れ。市場が金利低下、ドル安で反応したのも、この賃金の弱さまで織り込んだ動きかと思います。

1
T @code_T800 · D

What's most striking about this lineup is that while employment decreased, the unemployment rate was lower than expected. Looking at the details, the number of employed people decreased by 87,000, while the labor force decreased by 264,000, and the number of unemployed people decreased by 178,000. I believe the 4.1% figure is not so much due to "strong employment," but rather reflects the impact of a shrinking total number of people working or looking for work. This time, it seems more accurate to look at the labor force, employed people, and participation rate together, rather than just the fluctuations in the unemployment rate, to get a better picture of the reality.

original · ja

この並びでいちばん気になるのは、雇用が減ったのに失業率だけは予想より低いことです。中身を見ると、就業者が8.7万人減る一方、労働力人口は26.4万人減り、失業者も17.8万人減っていました。4.1%は「雇用が強い」というより、働くか職を探す人の総数が縮んだ影響を含む数字と見ます。 今回は失業率の上下だけでなく、労働力人口、就業者、参加率を一緒に見る方が実態に近そうです。

リョウホウ @1DDhzz5pYG73607 ·

@buffett_taro I was surprised because I thought they wouldn't release bad statistics until the midterm elections. I guess they were actually down around -200,000 and tried really hard to make it positive Well, I haven't really trusted employment statistics since the Biden administration anyway

original · ja

@buffett_taro 中間選挙まで悪い統計データ出さないと思ってたのに以外だ。 本当は−20万位で鉛筆舐めまくったけどプラスには出来なかったって所かな まあ、バイデン政権の頃から雇用統計はあんまり信用してないけど

1