Post

@WuBlockchain Upgrading or going offline is a pretty stark choice.

@WuBlockchain AI finding bugs in CLN before devs is wild. tough spot to be in.

There's a saying in Korea... "You can't turn a pumpkin into a watermelon by drawing lines on it." This is exactly the future that countless L2 systems will face. Do you think the fundamental problems caused by the inherent limitations of L1 will be solved just by haphazardly adding L2? Think about it logically. If the building's structure and framework are garbage, what difference does it make to just patch it up and do a fancy interior renovation? It's just garbage that looks shiny on the outside. Yet, there are many scammers who package this garbage (L1) attractively (L2) and sell it to the public at high prices. We use the terms "fraud" and "deception" in situations like this. You can consider a blockchain haphazardly plastered with L2 as a basic scam. You get what I mean, right?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@WuBlockchain AI-reported bugs forcing node shutdowns is a new level of chaos tbh

@WuBlockchain The interesting part is not that AI found bugs—it’s how disclosure is handled. “Upgrade or go offline” before full details are public is the right asymmetry: defenders get a mitigation window while exploit information stays temporarily constrained.

@WuBlockchain Telling operators to take Lightning nodes offline over AI generated reports with no public CVE is not mature security. It is how you freeze a payments layer while the team scrambles behind an embargo.

@WuBlockchain The fact that these issues were discovered and addressed publicly demonstrates that the security research community (including AI tools) is making efforts; exposing problems is better than hiding them.