Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to @WuBlockchain

W WuBlockchain
Wu Blockchain
@WuBlockchain

HPC and trade[XYZ] Recommend that the CFTC Allow Energy Perpetual Contracts into the U.S. Market The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and trade[XYZ], a third-party market deployer on Hyperliquid, have submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). They recommend establishing a regulated U.S. market access pathway for crude oil and natural gas perpetual contracts, and support 24/7 trading. The two parties also recommend allowing stablecoins and tokenized traditional assets to be used as margin, and recognizing on-chain infrastructure for trading, clearing, and settlement.

photo photo

· 24K Views

10 Reposts 1 Quotes 76 Likes 7 Bookmarks
replies reposts likes
9 replies collected of 11 X reports
W WuBlockchain
Wu Blockchain @WuBlockchain · 556K A
4
T teskorhub
teskor @teskorhub · D

@WuBlockchain The clearing and liquidation framework is the real hurdle

A leeky_k_crypt
AMk.Crypto 🧢 @leeky_k_crypt · D

@WuBlockchain Energy perps with 24/7 trading is a bold new frontier.

5 YunCipolloni
50返OKX果果Visa卡可领 @YunCipolloni ·

@WuBlockchain This looks pretty interesting; it seems like it's going to be quite a spectacle for a while.

original · zh

@WuBlockchain 这事儿看着挺新鲜 感觉又要热闹一阵子了

D noskcireCV
decentrader @noskcireCV · D

@WuBlockchain insider said Hyperliquid allowed in the US if they used USD1

M MacroBombastic
Macro Bombastic @MacroBombastic · 11K D

@WuBlockchain I think this could be a big step for on-chain derivatives in the US

W WhaleGrid
Whale Grid @WhaleGrid · D

Worth keeping the word "comment letter" in view. This is a submission asking the CFTC to clarify, not an application awaiting approval. Their own text says it: bringing energy perps into the regulated market "requires no new legislation," and the five asks are to adopt, reaffirm, clarify, recognize and confirm — pointing back to the May CFTC order as existing authority. So the news is two private parties asking a regulator to restate what they argue is already permitted. Whether the Commission answers, and when, is the open part.

G gyukatsu_maxi
gyukatsu.hl @gyukatsu_maxi · D

@WuBlockchain Energy perps filing is the kind of boring headline that ages well. Real liquidity wants real underlying exposure, not another meme wrapper.

E ESignalRadar
Early Signal @ESignalRadar · D

@WuBlockchain The regulatory pathway is the headline. The real test is whether energy perps can attract sustained open interest and liquidity once offered in a compliant U.S. market. Approval without usage would be a very different signal.