Post

@0xNairolf That sounds good, it forces creators to prove their true value instead of just dumping coins. But who will be the one to decide if that "market prediction" is fair? 🤔

@0xNairolf problem is that KOLs won't choose this model as long as the current model works

@0xNairolf unlocks tied to a market predicting value increase that market itself can be gamed by the creator buying yes shares before proposing

@0xNairolf so the creator has to pitch like a startup every time they want their own bag investors vote with the market, not vibes

@0xNairolf @nftboi_ you guys should talk

@0xNairolf just do the airdrop !

@0xNairolf yeah cool concept but the market will just become another game to play

@0xNairolf oh??

@0xNairolf That makes creator incentives feel earned through outcomes, not promises

@0xNairolf so basically every creator becomes a political campaign manager for their own supply x.com/sndcapp/status/209220384…

@0xNairolf so basically creators have to speedrun value creation to unlock their own bag ngl that would filter out a lot of grifters real quick

@0xNairolf futarchy didn't work for startups, why it should work for creators?

@0xNairolf yeppppp not sure how you’d do it, but you can offer supply to workers, only sellable at certain mc cc will invent so many new ways to run your company

@0xNairolf Could make creator coins much healthier

@0xNairolf if the market can price the proposal before the creator gets paid, you've changed the incentive entirely

@0xNairolf This is a much better incentive model, creator allocations become tied to measurable outcomes instead of being unlocked upfront and left to trust.

Imagine coin that just retroactively rewards public good provision using futarchy. It works cause setting precedent of rewarding invites more public good doing in the future making the token price go up immediately. Don't ask what coin can do for you ask what you can do for the coin first.