Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to @deepakshenoy

D deepakshenoy
Deepak Shenoy
@deepakshenoy

RBI proposes a draft that removes on-demand loans by NBFCs. Means: No more overdraft like facility from NBFCs. This is important, because NBFCs could take security (like stocks, mutual funds etc) and give people a loan facility that behaves like a bank overdraft. Meaning, you get a facility for 50 lakh, and you can draw any amount, say 10 lakh for a few days, repay it back, then take it again etc. You get charged interest only for the time that you have taken money, but the facility itself lasts a year or more, so you can do this many times over. Effectively, it's on-demand credit repayable anytime, without new loan agreements each time This is a great facility, mostly because it can be used for temporary liquidity in a very short period of time, without needed to sell the stock or mutual funds you own. Now, if RBI's rules go through, only banks can do this. For you and me, this is a no brainer; banks have a 1 cr. limit on such overdrafts against securities. It hurts those that use such facilities to borrow more (only NBFCs can give higher value loans than 1 cr). By restricting this to only banks - it will massively reduce the playing field for such loans. And it will have to change the business model for loan-against-mutual-funds startups to move to pure term loans (fixed term loans, repayable in EMI or bullet, no repeated taking of loan once returned) Since this is an on-demand loan, the section pertaining to "demand/call loans" goes away. Meaning no loans that are flexible repayment whenever you want, etc. This still leaves some hope - that if you need money, you can quickly digitally get a loan, with a digital pre-approval perhaps. But it has to have a fixed tenure and repayment plan, with perhaps a zero prepayment penalty. (Or just use a bank) Also this hurts NBFCs that might on-lend to other NBFCs by taking securities as collateral. Don't know the impact of this yet. I think it's a little regressive, this rule. Perhaps they could restrict the scale of this to say 5 cr. per borrower instad of removing it outright from NBFCs. Banks need competition to do better for customers.

not downloaded

· 37K Views

29 Reposts 12 Quotes 213 Likes 90 Bookmarks
replies reposts likes
29 replies collected of 30 X reports
SOM | Orden Monetario @SomMonetario ·

This proposal looks less like a retail lending reform and more like a redefinition of the regulatory perimeter. The key question is not loan-against-securities itself, but which institutions should be allowed to provide revolving, on-demand liquidity. By restricting these facilities to banks, the RBI appears to be concentrating flexible credit creation within the regulated banking system while pushing NBFCs back toward fixed-term lending. It fits a broader post-crisis regulatory trend where resilience and supervisory consistency increasingly take precedence over expanding the shadow banking ecosystem.

Ambarish @ambarishk22 ·

@deepakshenoy If nothing else atleast I hope sheet number of calls that people get will reduce. Maybe few folks will see productivity gains!! 😅

Sathish @sathishpgw ·

@deepakshenoy Why is RBI doing this?

Deepak Shenoy @deepakshenoy · 292K

Made this an article for edits/comments later: x.com/deepakshenoy/status/2085…

1 1
Vishal Gupta @nicemarwariboy ·

@deepakshenoy This kills the flexible LAS facility business

Pravin Tiwari @PravinTiwariX ·

@deepakshenoy Every draw down becomes a fresh TL with its own repayment structure? From the user perspective it only sees what the fresh emi is and rest of the complication is managed under the hood. It will impact perpetual interest only emi structures for sure.

Pravin Yadav @Yadav2927 ·

Biggest setback for Bajaj Finance because this is USP of Bajaj and I am not sure exactly but most of revenue comes from OD loan. In fact all NBFC main business is OD loan. @grok what types of loans will be affected Does it impact loan against mutual funds or share/stock? Does it impact OD loan of Bajaj finance? What about loan of existing customers?

1 6
Anand Murumkar @AnandMurumkar ·

@deepakshenoy Is this applicable only for individuals or for corporate also?

Sampath Karthik @kat479 ·

@deepakshenoy I wish Bajaj Finance and other top NBFCs apply for bank license.

Anand @anvaya_anand ·

@deepakshenoy is gold financing similar ?? u can borrow more if god appreciates ??

option_scalper @sagar_0896 ·

@deepakshenoy Huge hit for prop trading firms.

Siddhant Shah @SiddhantPriya74 ·

@deepakshenoy Harshad Mehta.....but Legally

Why Stocks Move @WhyStocksMove ·

@deepakshenoy @grok but why would RBI do this? If collateral is in place, what’s the threat in on-demand nature of the loan?

1
investorwealth @Wealth100000x ·

@deepakshenoy Govt is helping banks by cutting traders and Tax payers. Banking lobby are making trading rules.

Amit Agarwal @agrwal_amit ·

@deepakshenoy This is been the main vehicle used by many NBFCs to evergreen the loans and hide NPAs. Many stressed borrowers fell into debt trap due to this. Banks are very selective in opening credit lines. Good move

1 4
Mohan Ahuja @Emeneay ·

@deepakshenoy These directions r not applicable to NBFC authorised to issue credit card is BF authorised to issue credit card

1
M Raj @MrVeritas ·

@deepakshenoy Our regulators are BURDEN and Blot on ease of doing business. @RBI @SEBI_updates

Rajesh @rkstweets ·

@deepakshenoy Totally surprised. What does RBI gain by doing this? Can you please share per-NBFC impact analysis, especially on #LTF? @deepakshenoy @DigantHaria

CA Akshit Singhal @CAAkshitSinghal ·

The real challenge here isn't just big HNWIs losing >₹1 Cr lines it’s the retail borrower and digital credit innovation getting collateral damage. • Retail Friction: Eliminating flexi-loans means a borrower needing ₹50k for 10 days now has to take a rigid term loan, pay processing fees, and deal with fixed schedules instead of simple drawdown-and-repay limits. • Bank Monopoly: Restricting revolving credit strictly to banks and credit cards limits competition, giving legacy banks total pricing power over overdraft products. Instead of an outright ban, establishing clear LTV caps and asset-backed monitoring for NBFC flexi-lines would contain systemic risk without killing credit accessibility!

prasadpn @prasadpn ·

@deepakshenoy Any innovation Kill it PSU banks Last year they killed P2P lending

BondsTruly @BondsTruly ·

@deepakshenoy @RBI @SEBI_India @FinMinIndia this is the most rediculious thing from rbi, supervisory , ssm and juniors does not have macro gravitas and seniority because of one or two small players they suggest random thing to there bosses and implement. Did rbi senior cinsult anyone at nbfc

BondsTruly @BondsTruly ·

@deepakshenoy Bajaj, fin, tata capital, jio fina, aditya birla, and many big names helping economy grow what us the point or creating hurdle. Also what is the macro economic risk they are proctecting by implementing this

Amit Prakash @docamitoph ·

@deepakshenoy What purpose does this solve ?

Pratik Mehta @pratikmehta2604 ·

@deepakshenoy So Bajaj and Tata aggressively pushed OD facilities to professional like Doctor, CA, CS all that also stops? Without any collateral

The Finthusiast @thefinthusiast ·

But you are only focusing on asset side of NBFCs book, on demand loans pose a major risk ALM wise due to it nature. If what you say is true that NBFCs were extending loans to a single customer in crores of rupees, they were not only playing with concentration risk in a particular segment which is inherently volatile due to underlying asset but also run a risk on liability side if prepayments or delayed payments on asset side were to compress their earnings or liquidity. RBI, being a regulator, is giving due weightage to systemic risk it poses rather than business viability. What happened in Korea can very much happen in India if these loans against securities increases multifold. Also, you forgot to highlight that their is LTV in these loans despite them being on demand. Means, 50% loan is extended against securities value. Any corrections above 20% can trigger recall clauses and market wide selling by these lenders given securities are pledged. Second and third order impact will be on mutual funds, who will be forced to maintain cash to counter any of those redemptions and if not they would also sell en masse. RBI's decision to take away this product from NBFC space is correct to save system itself.

.. @paharibhai51 ·

@deepakshenoy Good decision. They are giving loans to students and very low people income with this limit and when they can't pay harrasment is done

Falak Kalyani @FalakKalyani · 11K

@deepakshenoy An attempt to stop asset quality masking by nbfc? Also possible outcome is stable M3 supply?

Dhiraj Sinha @dhirajsinha ·

@deepakshenoy It would be interesting to see how repeated, digitally originated term loans are restricted in the final policy. Technology exists to replicate much of the convenience of a flexi facility, provided RBI permits genuine fresh underwriting/sanction.

Sudhanshu @5udhan5hu ·

@deepakshenoy This effectively pushes NBFCs toward securitization and on-balance-sheet funding models instead — could be a meaningful cost-of-funds shift for the mid-sized NBFCs that leaned heavily on overdraft-style facilities.