Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to deliverables

R RobinSeun
RobinSeun_维京黑船
@RobinSeun

鸿蒙智行:从未要求下架“竹知了” (看完全文,其实就是投诉了) 8月4日晚,@鸿蒙智行发言人 发布关于近期“竹知了”相关网络信息的情况说明,全文如下: 近日,围绕“竹知了”相关话题,网络上出现了大量讨论,也有不少网友对相关投诉提出疑问。 此前,我们希望通过克制处理,避免进一步放大争议,随着相关信息持续扩散,一些说法逐渐偏离事实。 我们感谢大家的关注、批评和监督。现将有关事实说明如下:长期以来,网络上持续存在恶意剪辑、仿冒相关高管声音、利用AI丑化肖像、虚假归因、侮辱诽谤等侵害个人合法权益的内容。我们一直依法开展日常取证和投诉。 本次投诉是日常维权工作的一部分,针对的是具体侵权内容,并非针对“竹知了”玩具。 截至8月4日晚,共监测到相关网络信息累计5.6万余条。我们实际对其中171条具体侵权内容发起投诉,平台反馈下架144条。 经多部门复核,相关投诉均有明确侵权事实和留存证据,不存在仅为正常把玩、制作、展示或者销售“竹知了”的内容。我们未向任何电商平台投诉“竹知了”商品,也从未要求任何电商平台下架、停售该商品。 网络上有关“全网下架”、“禁止销售”、“许多单纯展示玩具或分享童年回忆的普通视频也被连带下架,部分账号头像变灰、昵称被重置”等说法与事实不符。 我们珍视消费者的每一份关注,聚焦产品和服务体验,也愿意认真倾听大家的批评与建议。面对不同声音,我们会保持谦逊、真诚和克制,不断改进工作。我们尊重正常的网络表达和善意批评,同时也将依法维护企业和个人的合法权益。再次感谢大家的关注和监督。

@

继续升级,群众们号也不要了,都拼了。 华为在维护什么? 维护自己永远正确,不可被质疑的无上权威,以及维护-有崇拜偶像情节的-自己的受众群体。 群众们在抗争什么? 在抗争自己被压制了几十年的发言权:其他事儿不让说就算了,你一个企业…竟然也…我跟你拼了😂😂 好事儿,好事儿! https://x.com/RobinSeun/status/2084499965997711380/video/1

· 11K Views

2 Reposts 1 Quotes 39 Likes 4 Bookmarks
replies reposts likes
16 replies collected of 27 X reports
老猫牙口好 @Lwith3cats ·

@RobinSeun “We actually filed complaints against 171 specific pieces of infringing content, and the platform responded by removing 144 of them.”

original · zh

@RobinSeun “我们实际对其中171条具体侵权内容发起投诉,平台反馈下架144条。”

1
哈哈的风 @beicanword ·

@RobinSeun He might be telling the truth, but reality is irrelevant now; everyone's just acting on emotion. Show us the data... This crisis management is a failure.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 可能他说的是真的,但是现实已经没有意义了,大家全是情绪,拿数据出来。。。。。 这危机公关不及格

3
zsj80 @SJ8075554 ·

@RobinSeun As of the evening of August 4th, a total of over 56,000 related online messages were monitored. We actually filed complaints against 171 specific pieces of infringing content, and the platform responded by removing 144 of them. ——“A total of over 56,000 related online messages were monitored” So, every move of netizens is under Huawei's surveillance. Isn't this the most terrifying thing?

original · zh

@RobinSeun 截至8月4日晚,共监测到相关网络信息累计5.6万余条。我们实际对其中171条具体侵权内容发起投诉,平台反馈下架144条。 ——“共监测到相关网络信息累计5.6万余条” 原来,网友的一举一动,都在你华为的监控之中。 难道这不是最可怕的吗?

8
落霞与孤鹜齐飞🇺🇦🇺🇦 @luoxiayuguwu_ ·

@RobinSeun All show and no substance, your lewd intentions can no longer be concealed, so you pretend not to know.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 华而不实,猥琐欲为看盖不住了,就出来装不知道

8
bluesea @TruncateJP ·

@RobinSeun Is it really necessary to keep criticizing Huawei? Did Huawei steal some people's jobs?

original · zh

@RobinSeun 有必要盯着华为喷?华为是抢了某些人的饭碗?

6
哆啦美不是宝可梦 @bodyno214755 ·

@RobinSeun "Showy but impractical, doing whatever one pleases"

original · zh

@RobinSeun “华”而不实 为所欲”为”

3
Yige Lihaideren @lihaideren79505 ·

@RobinSeun Even if you photoshop Yu Dazui into a cicada, what law did you break? Ever since the crime of insulting martyrs was introduced, the simplified Chinese internet has developed to the point where no jokes are tolerated, regardless of whether the person is dead or alive.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 就算把余大嘴P成竹知了,又犯了哪条法呢?自从出了侮辱英烈罪,现在简中网上已经发展到任何一点调侃都容不下了,甭管死人活人。

4
時光聚財 @YongShi3271 ·

@RobinSeun They are always right.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 他们永远正确

2

@RobinSeun He really couldn't handle the public outrage, so he started to back down again.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 实在搞不定众怒了,又开始怂了

1
SimonChan @SimonCh4920 ·

@RobinSeun Another important factor is that HarmonyOS's statement doesn't represent the entirety of Huawei, and the entity that initiated the complaint is Huawei, not HarmonyOS. Therefore, when the entity is not unified, the content of the statement becomes very carefully crafted and visually appealing.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 还有一个重要因素,鸿蒙智行发言并不能代表华为全部,而且发起投诉的主体是华为,不是鸿蒙智行。 所以,当主体不统一的时候,这个发言,内容就很讲究很好看了。

6
怀莲🌸 @TristaWalk0dre ·

@RobinSeun I'm so horny 🍜😆 Anyone want to give me a sharp critique of my luck?

original · zh

@RobinSeun 我果然太涩了🍜😆有人想锐评一下我的福嘛

深度切片 @ShenDuQiePian ·

Thank you for the blogger's analysis. The blogger dissected how the company speaks, directly quoting the full text of HarmonyOS's official statement, and then using a parenthetical comment, "(After reading the whole text, it's actually a complaint)," breaking down the official wording of "We never demanded the removal of toys, only targeted specific infringing content," pointing out the gap between their evasiveness and actual action. The key is to grasp how the company redefines its behavior with precise language afterward, representing an immediate deconstruction of "the official rhetoric itself." Next, I'll explain why power must speak this way. If we place the Huawei complaint and the Cyberspace Administration of China's special action on the same timeline, it becomes clear that what is truly being protected is not commercial reputation, but the "systemic face" deeply bound to the official narrative. This article is for interested readers to further their reading. x.com/ShenDuQiePian/status/208…

original · zh

谢谢博主的拆解。博主拆了企业如何说话,直接引用鸿蒙智行官方声明全文,然后用一句括号点评“(看完全文,其实就是投诉了)”,把官方“我们从未要求下架玩具、只针对具体侵权内容”的措辞拆开,指出其回避与现实行动之间的裂缝,重点在于抓住企业事后如何用精确语言重新定义自己的行为,属于对“官方说辞本身”的即时解构。 那接下来我告诉大家权力为什么必须这样说话,如果把华为投诉和网信办专项行动放在同一时间线上,就能明确真正被保护的不是商业声誉,而是被官方叙事深度绑定的“体制脸面”,这篇文章供各位感兴趣的朋友延伸阅读。 https://x.com/ShenDuQiePian/status/2084713699269570571?s=20

1
凝碧🌸 @SusieFredeq75c ·

@RobinSeun I'm so horny 🍟😗 Anyone want to give me a sharp critique of my luck?

original · zh

@RobinSeun 我果然太涩了🍟😗有人想锐评一下我的福嘛

傲珊🌸 @ZonaSilasz8ii ·

@RobinSeun I bet nobody's more adventurous than me 🤣💛 I'm not shameless, just look!

original · zh

@RobinSeun 应该没人比我玩的开了吧🤣💛 我福不黑不信你看

Bella @BellaYang2023 ·

@RobinSeun Yes, the PR team also said that we never enforced quarantine policies during the pandemic; it was all voluntary.

original · zh

@RobinSeun 嗯,发炎部的肉喇叭也说,我们从未强制疫情期间隔离政策,都是自愿的

4

7 replies whose parent comment X withheld

bluesea @TruncateJP ·

@RobinSeun People who sell cars seem to be in completely different industries than you real estate people, right?

original · zh

@RobinSeun 人家卖车的与你们搞地产的好像行当都不一样吧?

1
bluesea @TruncateJP ·

@qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun Stop accusing others of being paid trolls. Do you even have the right to define others? You're just a loser.

original · zh

@qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun 别动不动就水军,你也配给别人来定义?一个屌丝而已

2
Jason@PalEcho @qwer1230987346 ·

@TruncateJP @RobinSeun I'm a loser? Then you're just a loser at best.

original · zh

@TruncateJP @RobinSeun 我是屌丝?那你充其量就是个屌

1
bluesea @TruncateJP ·

@qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun These traitorous lackeys only know how to spew filth.

original · zh

@qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun 土殖奴才只会满口喷粪?

1
砸锅卖铁办公室主任 @Momoinsky ·

@TruncateJP @RobinSeun Who's criticizing Huawei? Ahhh, this, this, this, ahhhhh, this, this, this counts as criticizing?

original · zh

@TruncateJP @RobinSeun 谁盯着华为喷了,啊啊这个这个这个啊啊啊啊这个这个这个算喷?

GrumpyML @grumpy_ml ·

@TruncateJP @qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun You're even more pathetic than the paid trolls. They get paid for saying things against their conscience, but you've been completely brainwashed.

original · zh

@TruncateJP @qwer1230987346 @RobinSeun 那你比水军还悲哀,水军说违背良心的话还拿到钱了,你纯属被洗脑洗傻了

1
GrumpyML @grumpy_ml ·

@qwer1230987346 @TruncateJP @RobinSeun You're also a genius who can't understand the context. Was I replying to you?

original · zh

@qwer1230987346 @TruncateJP @RobinSeun 你也是神人看不懂上下文,我回复的是你吗?

These were collected in full; the comment they answer was not returned by X.