Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to deliverables

G Showy005
George.TON
@Showy005

我认为大家可能误解了 @0xSLK 的意思。 他虽然没有推荐大家购买 $LEAK ,却也描述了 $LEAK 的价值。 他引用自己之前对 pools.trade 的合约、launch model、FRONG/CHWDR 的深度拆解,然后直接提出一个明确问题——“X-verified Instant Launch 路径在官方 UI 还没正式上线的情况下,是否已经能在链上跑通?” 他亲自部署了 $LEAK,证明这条路径已经可用,并且是第一个非同一钱包的独立验证部署者。 他还反复强调这是 infrastructure POC,没有 utility、没有 roadmap、没有 creator allocation、没有捆绑买盘。这是一个有趣的社区实验。 不仅如此,他还公开了自己的持仓约 13M,以及卖出计划($1M MC 以上卖一半)、以及已经收到的 creator fee 情况。 说实话,这是我看到质量比较高的一类 crypto 研究叙事——问题清晰、证据充分、行动验证、边界明确、利益公开。 亮点不在“挖到了黑料”或“预测未来”,而在于把没有正式开放的基础设施路径跑通并公开验证,同时保持了少见的克制,不是单纯的制造fomo让散户购买,然后砸盘。 我认为他是一名值得陪伴成长的dev,只要他言行一致。 CA:0xa85bd69ea5492e42bb912a82b4feed6fe10d5e12

photo
@

Follow-up to my http://pools.trade research. After digging through the public infrastructure behind Uniswap's upcoming launchpad, I wanted to answer one question: does the X-verified Instant Launch path already work outside the unreleased Pools UI? It does. I used it to deploy THE LEAK ($LEAK) on Robinhood Chain. CA: `0xa85Bd69EA5492e42bb912A82B4fEED6fe10D5e12` The deployment is tied to @0xSLK and my deployer wallet through Uniswap's official X verification flow. The identity data stored with the launch matches the onchain transaction sender. At the protocol level, $LEAK follows the same canonical deployment path as $FRONG. Both use the same official launch contracts, Instant strategy, supply model and v4 pool parameters. Their onchain receipts also pass the same structural verification. At the time of deployment, Uniswap's public data showed only $FRONG and $CHWDR as X-verified launches across these new launch paths, both from the same wallet. LEAK became the first entry from a different verified deployer. This was an infrastructure POC, not the beginning of a roadmap. There is no utility or promised product for $LEAK right now, and the launch itself included no creator allocation or bundled initial buy. Disclosure: as of posting, I hold approximately 13M LEAK. I currently plan to sell roughly half of that position if the token trades above a $1M market cap. Otherwise, I’m comfortable holding it and collecting creator fees, which have already exceeded my expectations for what started as a technical POC. I also built LaunchProof to track these deployments: https://www.launchproof.fun/ LaunchProof cross-checks Uniswap's launch data with onchain metadata and the transaction sender. It lets anyone inspect authenticated deployers without trusting a ticker, profile picture or narrative. One important distinction: X verification establishes provenance. It does not prove that a token is safe, useful, official or worth buying. Onchain receipts: $LEAK https://www.hoodexplorer.org/tx/0x9e44aa6882ecccbe2cdb10dc77db3e08f9a1f78db9adea8301919c7afcb4dd70 $FRONG https://www.hoodexplorer.org/tx/0xbe6b90c58c017b4754a6a6ee6d65be9a682d2b79de0142954ae345f1dce8f35c

· 11K Views

8 Reposts 4 Quotes 30 Likes 2 Bookmarks
replies reposts likes
6 replies collected of 27 X reports
K-Line @Maddere7 · 10K

@Showy005 @0xSLK It's indeed rare for him to publicly disclose his holdings and selling plans, but I'm quite curious about where the boundaries of on-chain verification and community experimentation lie, and how they will maintain this going forward.

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 他公开持仓和卖出计划这点确实少见,但链上验证和社区实验的边界到底在哪,我挺好奇后续怎么维持

1
南山币胜客 @hungry_twitt · 16K

@Showy005 @0xSLK Only verifying, not promoting, is a better attitude than simply giving trading advice.

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 只验证不鼓吹,这态度比单纯喊单好。

1
杰尼杰尼 @quanshaoze25025 ·

@Showy005 @0xSLK A very low-key developer

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 很低调的dev

1 4
GG_OGOG @GG_ogog ·

@Showy005 @0xSLK You son of a bitch, are you some kind of predator? Posting one every now and then, trying to fleece people, you scoundrel!

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 草泥马,你是韭菜头吗,一会发一个,割人嘛,祸害玩意

1
币圈 . 麻辣烫 @Skyn2026 ·

@Showy005 @0xSLK The 13M holdings and selling plan are clearly stated, which is more transparent than most developers, but the creator fee received is not clearly stated.

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 13M持仓和卖出计划都摆明了,这透明度比大多数dev强,但creator fee收到多少没说清啊

3 replies whose parent comment X withheld

GG_OGOG @GG_ogog ·

@Showy005 @0xSLK You son of a bitch, I lost money, you scoundrel!

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 草泥马,老子亏钱了,你这个祸害,

1
George.TON @Showy005 · 24K

@GG_ogog @0xSLK Nobody lost money when I posted it, except you. You should go join my group.

original · zh

@GG_ogog @0xSLK 我发的时候都没人亏,就你亏,你赶紧去我群里呆着吧

1
GG_OGOG @GG_ogog ·

@Showy005 @0xSLK What are you going to do? Lose even more, you idiot?

original · zh

@Showy005 @0xSLK 去干嘛,亏更多吗,傻逼

These were collected in full; the comment they answer was not returned by X.