Post

@ThinkingUSD Do it @JeffBezos

@ThinkingUSD Will be fire

@ThinkingUSD It starting to look like hyperliquid is going to end up like GMX. That's what I've been worrying about.

@ThinkingUSD evil jeff 🙏🙏

@ThinkingUSD and it is on growth mode aswell

@ThinkingUSD capital inefficiency on spot while perps print is the real head-scratcher zero fees might just be a band-aid if the core liquidity incentives arent there

@ThinkingUSD Zero fees could bootstrap the spot side, but keeping makers around afterward is harder.

@ThinkingUSD Solana is the best place for Spot!!! You really know that!!

@ThinkingUSD spot is dead without liquidity, fees aren't the problem

@ThinkingUSD zero fees don't fix thin liquidity, you need the makers first or it's just a cheap empty book

@ThinkingUSD No fees + mobile app. Lighter.

@ThinkingUSD Agree, many people wanted to ape billions into purr-2:native but weren’t sure because of the fees. @purrcto agrees

@ThinkingUSD flood its time to rotate into $lit

I don’t think that would fix the problem Like their target users are retail people And retail people doesn’t care about the fees (I am pretty sure that 90% of retail traders does t know that buying any coin on CEX, has a hidden fee in that) The main problem is why would you need to buy some assets on spot, on hyperevm, when you can’t fully use that in DeFi First they have to show where to put the money into, so buying in spot will be interesting I can’t wait the lending markets for RWA assets, stocks, etc Like yes, they already exist afaik, but still not there yet to attract huge amount of capital

@ThinkingUSD @SoskaKyle Exit minded

@ThinkingUSD @SoskaKyle Add better lending infra

@ThinkingUSD good idea

@ThinkingUSD zero fees attract flow but makers need incentives first

@ThinkingUSD Or you know, just use Lighter

@ThinkingUSD Maybe negative fee for makers that peels off the taker fee

@ThinkingUSD zero fees won't fix books we need makers 🤘

@ThinkingUSD DROP THOSE FEES and let spot finally stop feeling like a side quest 🤘

@ThinkingUSD @rootslashbin I’d happily trade slightly lower protocol revenue today for a much deeper spot market tomorrow

@ThinkingUSD is it possible to do a more native spot market? I dont like the unit stuff.

@ThinkingUSD @SoskaKyle Bearish af short term

@ThinkingUSD Your panic absolutely delights me. #painfullyaverage

@ThinkingUSD hyperliquid

@ThinkingUSD Hyperliquid

@ThinkingUSD DROP THOSE FEES

@ThinkingUSD correct, and while we're here the 60p my parking app adds should also be zero

@ThinkingUSD Not sure if 0 fee will fix the book, but certainly can try

@ThinkingUSD Yes, Hyperliquid spot markets are not good enough atm

@ThinkingUSD the best they could do is dropping S3

@ThinkingUSD SPOT FEES TO ZERO

@ThinkingUSD Still no s3. They rugged

@ThinkingUSD Or reduce de supply. There's to much HYPE supply

@ThinkingUSD never apologize. just drop those fees!

@ThinkingUSD Spot volume at 3.8% of perp volume. That's the stat that matters At 5bps maker / 10bps taker, the big players aren't trading spot. They're using perps for leverage, not capital efficiency.

@ThinkingUSD Tbh it would expose a lot of CEXs (i.e. Coinbase) in terms of predatory spot fees Why pay 3% to CB when you can pay 0% and get the same thing

@ThinkingUSD Hype going to 25$

@ThinkingUSD @rootslashbin I think competitive over zero would be better

@ThinkingUSD @encryptbit Drop those fees pls Jeff thanks

@ThinkingUSD Thought u sold

@ThinkingUSD let the free market work its magic and Hyperliquid will adapt with lower fees or risk being outcompeted by other exchanges that offer more competitive rates

@ThinkingUSD i think the real trick to ramping up spot volumes could be to making it a more quick and convenient fiat onramp hyperliquid needs to feel just as easy to start using as the major CEXs like Coinbase and Binance not too high of a bar imo

@ThinkingUSD @SoskaKyle Stables should be 0 at least

@ThinkingUSD I do be liking Hyperliquid

@ThinkingUSD x.com/ItsEasypop/status/208411…

@ThinkingUSD yes

@ThinkingUSD I got an idea… Solana