Post

7/10 VI. Gate claims to be cooperating with the police, but where are the leads? Gate has repeatedly stated publicly that it is "fully cooperating with the police" and "has obtained a large amount of information." However, as far as I know, Gate has not yet provided the police with any information that could effectively pinpoint the attackers. If you truly possess a large amount of information, why not immediately and completely submit it to the police to assist in apprehending the attackers? True cooperation is not about releasing public relations statements, but about handing over the evidence you have to the police. Is this delay in providing information an attempt to protect the attackers?

8/10 VII. Gate, please conduct an authoritative verification of the risk control materials immediately. Gate, please provide a direct answer regarding the verification time; this is the most important point. Don't try to explain further. Please have Gate submit the original materials submitted by the attacker—the ID card held in hand, the live face video, and the complete review records—to a qualified independent and authoritative institution for verification. My stance is very clear: If the verification proves the ID card held in hand is genuine and valid, and the person in the live face video is indeed me, I will no longer pursue legal action against Gate and will issue a public apology. Conversely, if the verification confirms the ID card is forged, the live face is not mine, and the withdrawal was not made by me, this is sufficient proof that the attacker used false materials to breach Gate's verification and risk control system. Gate has publicly promised: "If it is the platform's responsibility for verification, 100% compensation will be provided." If the verification confirms that fake materials and a non-person's live face passed the platform's verification, please have Gate immediately fulfill its promise, assume responsibility, and provide 100% compensation to users for their losses. The beastly Gate must stop creating controversy and insinuating against users.

On October 10th, Gate.cn didn't directly respond to when they would implement "ID card hand-held material + liveness video verification." Instead, they kept throwing out claims like "honey trap," "insider theft," and "two Alipay accounts stolen," implying victimized users and diverting public attention. Gate.cn is a master of lying, shirking responsibility, blaming users, saying one thing and doing another, lacking accountability, contradicting themselves, and delaying action. Gate.cn is a pile of risk control garbage disguised as an exchange: their pre-incident checks are practically non-existent, and afterward they turn a deaf ear, refusing to submit evidence or admit responsibility, only capable of spreading rumors, shifting blame, and confusing the public. Money was transferred from their platform using fake information and by unregistered individuals, yet they turn around and blame the users—both incompetent and shameless. Their so-called "security" is a joke, and their so-called "100% compensation" is utter nonsense. Gate.cn doesn't deserve to talk about risk control; they only deserve to be nailed to the pillar of shame in the cryptocurrency world!