Skip to content
Archive

Post

Back to deliverables

C copezilla
Copezilla
@copezilla

Fair asks, mostly. Failsafes, a real backstop fund, pausing instead of bleeding users, right direction, no argument. But "compensate losses like every other platform does" isn't really a thing. Look back: when Binance's own systems failed in the May 2021 crash, hundreds to thousands of traders got liquidated, losses north of $100M and Binance first denied liability ("perfectly normal for the tokens to drop"), then offered 5–30% back, tied to an NDA and waiving your right to sue. One guy down ~$9M was offered a few grand. Its 2025 "Together" program got branded fake compensation. Who actually made users whole after a glitch? Almost no one. The good venues run an insurance fund, SAFU, HLP, Aave's Umbrella and even Umbrella held ~$80–100M against a ~$230M hole weeks ago. The backstop is the right ask; "everyone already does it cleanly" is for sure a myth. And the clean fixes aren't clean either. Hyperliquid could only override the JELLY oracle because the Foundation ran all 5 validators at the time, the house voting with itself. Aave's ETH only came back because Arbitrum's Security Council froze it... emergency power, on a chain that sells itself as decentralized. Stopping the exploit? Right. Clean, decentralized, fair? So "only Polymarket can't grasp this" doesn't hold up. Nobody here is perfect. I don't even follow Kalshi closely, but dig in and you'd find its own list. None of it makes Polymarket better or worse, and I'm not carrying water for them. The only thing worth grading anyone on is whether they fix what's broken. But to bring it to a point . . We're fully aligned on the sequencing, new features are fine, but the core product has to actually run first. You don't bolt on perps, parlays and the next shiny thing while the base still drops trades or glitches under load, that just multiplies the surface area of what can break. Get the foundation rock-solid, then expand. I made the same argument in my Perps writeup: a competent perp still isn't a reason to exist if the thing underneath isn't bulletproof. Fix the floor before you add floors.

· 58 Views

2 Likes
replies reposts likes
1 replies collected
Rickysfundamentals @rickytheirish · 22K

I agree with most of the things you say. Except citing that platforms like binance don't have safu funds and make efforts to compensate users in glitch instances, but you are using major sector wide crashes as examples. If the entire crypto market cap is wiped billions of dollars in a global flash crash and limit orders or stop losses do not trigger, that is very understandable. But binance has paid out millions of dollars to users who experienced isolated issues and random site based issues over the years, even hyperliquid has. Polymarket glitches are a daily occurence. I have been documenting glitches and using polymarket exclusively since q3 of 2025. I have logged over 47,000 manual trades on polymarket. I have trade logs and i document every one of my activitys and add notes. I made alot of profit on polymarket, but have had a large number of losses. Over 92% of my losses are all due to site malfunctions/errors/glitches/bugs, things that were all out of my control. The few times i experienced losses due to technical errors on kraken, htx and even on mexc, i was credited in full or partially after they investigated and admitted fault was on their systems end. Polymarket is aware of their insane amount of glitches, but they will not take accountability.

1