Skip to content
Archive
← r/SideProject
1
100%
u/hartman_max 3 hours ago

I built image utility site that works in your browser and looking for your feedback

Hi redditors, I'm looking for feedback. Really got tired from all that "just give us your email" and we send you processed image and made a site that has a small collection of tools like background removal and upscaling. It works fully in the browser which is both good and bad: it's good because nothing gets uploaded anywhere and you can be sure your files are yours 100% and bad because heavy processing on mobile devices can take a bit more time. https://reddit.com/link/1x3wlol/video/1ga… What I would be super greatful to hear from you about is: * What other tools would make sense there in your opinion? * What do you think of it in general? But also any other feedback is super welcome, thanks! 😄
6 comments held Reddit says 0 on reddit ↗
  1. u/[deleted] 1 3 hours ago

    [removed] — already gone when the archive first saw it

  2. u/buro_3 1 3 hours ago
    Looking at your homepage and converter (I haven’t processed a file), I’d clarify the limits before adding more tools. The homepage says batch size isn’t capped, while the converter says 10 images / 50 MB per batch. “No daily credits; up to 10 images / 50 MB per batch” would make that distinction clear. For a next feature, I’d prioritise a resize → convert → compress hand-off, so someone preparing a web image can finish the job without downloading and reselecting it between tools. Disclosure: I work on BeginThings tools; AI assisted the wording.
  3. u/hartman_max OP 1 3 hours ago
    Oh, thanks, I'll fix the copy!
  4. u/Elegant-Golf5516 1 2 hours ago
    For a next feature, I’d choose a client-handoff preset over another AI transformation: name the files consistently, show final pixel dimensions/file size, and make the transparency choice explicit before export. A freelancer could then hand over “hero-1600.webp” and “logo-transparent.png” without checking every output manually. Your homepage already explains that JPG/PDF flatten transparency to white and that upscaling can substantially increase file size. Those are useful warnings; bring them into the relevant export decision rather than expecting users to read the whole homepage. I only reviewed the public page, not a processed file. Disclosure: I publish SignalSprint’s freelancer/workflow guides; no affiliation with LeanImg.
  5. u/Superb-Boysenberry78 1 2 hours ago
    A capture-date option would be useful alongside the image tools: show whether the export keeps or removes the original date metadata, and let people keep the original filename. For photos collected over time, a smaller image is less useful if it becomes hard to place it back with the day it belongs to. I have only read your description, not processed a file.
  6. u/hartman_max OP 1 2 hours ago
    ah, so you mean something like you upload a bulk of photos and they are e.g. renamed with a date added to the file name or something like that?