Skip to content
Archive
← r/Superstonk
1
100%
u/LittleThiccRedLuigi 1 day ago ☁ Hype/ Fluff

Gamestop and the tides: How a bunch of smooth brains caused the driest flood in history

Let me start off by saying that i bought into this stock in the first week of January 2021. I’m still here. I love this community. Some of you are genuinely brilliant. Smarter than I’ll ever be. But holy fucking shit… Some of you are the smoothest, most weaponized, regarded motherfuckers I’ve ever encountered. The amount of times I’ve read: “We have $10B cash and our market cap is only $9.5B!! We trade under book value!!!” No, you beautiful fucking primates. It’s 👏 cash 👏 minus 👏 liabilities. Not cash. **Net** cash. There’s a fucking difference. Our net cash isn´t even close to $10B. And don’t even get me started on dilution. For YEARS this company traded at valuations that made absolutely no fucking sense fundamentally. It was objectively expensive. Ryan Cohen looked at a stock trading way above any reasonable fundamental valuation and basically said: “Yeah… I’ll sell some of that.” Good. That’s exactly what he should’ve done. He sold overpriced paper and turned it into billions of dollars in cash. That gave him the financial freedom to turn this company around. The fortress balance sheet we have today exists because of those offerings. Do I like another 75 million shares? No. Do I think it magically means every share is worth 16% less? Also no. The company isn’t just printing shares and giving them away. It’s getting something in return. Just like with the potential accretive dilution for the eBay deal, we may own a smaller slice of the cake… but **the cake is also getting a whole lot bigger**. Whether that’s a good deal depends on **what they get in return and whether the value they create from it is greater than what they gave up**. To quote Larry: GameStop is converting debt into equity “Because they value the upside potential of owning the equity more than the downside protection of owning the debt.” All of the bots crying over a sub-20% dip seem to have forgotten we were trading around $12 just two years ago and what we have been through. I watched the most absurd price action I’ve ever seen, retail going toe-to-toe with some of the biggest financial institutions on the planet, bots flooding the gambling sub with every distraction ticker imaginable, the buy button disappearing, politicians pretending to care and everyone promising investigations, then listened to absolute fucking silence. I’ve seen DD gods rise and disappear. I’ve survived every “Tomorrow is THE day”, T+whatever, technical analysis, quad witching, CAT, CUSIP, Splividend, „trust me bro”. Every hype date that turned into the biggest nothingburger known to mankind. And I bought every. Single. Fucking. Dip. From $400 pre-split all the way down to $40. There was this undeniably weird price action. They hammered it down to around $40 after the sneeze, kept it there for weeks, and then out of absolutely fucking nowhere it ripped back to $350 without any news. These random violent spikes kept happening over and over again. It always felt like they were trying to sell us the story that the shorts had closed, despite the SEC showing there wasn’t anywhere near enough short seller buying volume during the sneeze for that to have happened. That’s why I held. And that’s why many of you held. https://preview.redd.it/c7g9egd47sih1.jpg… I still believe there’s a position somewhere that eventually has to be unwound. Maybe it’s a massive short position, maybe it’s something more complicated than that. And maybe they can keep kicking the can down the road for years. The system is complicated, corrupt as fuck, and I honestly have very little faith in the U.S. market. If shit really hit the fan, I wouldn’t be surprised if they’d just pull the buy button again and call it a day. But if there will never be the violent, market-breaking squeeze we dreamed about, will it be because the system is corrupt? Or because Ryan diluted us? I don’t know. What I do know is that there’s been some seriously shady shit surrounding this stock for years. And I still hope it eventually blows up in their faces. But not only did it feel like there was not enough pressure on them for that to happen, it’s also become painfully obvious that **Ryan was never here for the squeeze**. He was here to **build a company.** Ryan’s only goal has been to run this company efficiently. He streamlined the business, cut the fat, and turned a dying brick-and-mortar retailer into a profitable company with a fortress balance sheet. And I know that **hands-on leadership, skin in the game, and actually giving a shit about the company instead of paying overpriced consultants to piss money against the wall** are things worth investing in. The only problem is that we’re the smoothest, crayon-eating, financially self-destructive pack of apes on this planet, so we just kept buying anyway. I’ve listened to crying smooth brains telling me the stock was “undervalued” while we were trading at valuations that would’ve made most companies blush. Ryan did an amazing job turning this company around. The problem was that the stock price didn’t reflect reality very well because for years we were absurdly overvalued, while we closed unprofitable stores and revenue declined. That was Ryan lowering the tide before trying to raise the fleet. But when we became profitable and the tide started to rise, our boat was parked on **a fucking mountain**. Now the tide is finally coming back in, and this time the boat is actually floating on fundamentals instead of pure fucking hype. Our earnings finally look solid. Our PE is below 20. For the first time in years, you can actually argue GameStop is being valued somewhat rationally. And now we’re talking about **eBay.** Collectibles, and maybe even physical assets in general, are slowly becoming more financialized. The winners in physical assets may not only be the companies selling the items. They may be the companies controlling the trust layer and infrastructure around buying, selling, authenticating, and reselling those assets. Uber isn't a taxi company, Meta isn't a content creator, Airbnb isn´t a hotel company. They built platforms that became the infrastructure connecting supply and demand. If GameStop wants to become a serious marketplace for authenticated physical assets, acquiring existing infrastructure could accelerate that vision instead of building everything from the ground up. GameStop has reached a point where simply **cutting costs isn’t enough** anymore. The fat is gone. The business is lean. Retail growth is naturally limited. The next step is **making the cake bigger.** Ryan is willing to buy the biggest cake he can get his hands on and do exactly what he did with GameStop: trim the fat, improve the business, and unlock value. And it turns out he’s pretty damn good at cutting fat. He took this company from a dollar-per-share, dying brick-and-mortar retailer to a leaner and profitable company that´s worth billions. The sad part is that because of our absurd valuation, it happened in the most unceremonious way imaginable. But he did it. And he wants to do it with eBay, even though it´s an ambitious and risky plan. But if you want to grow, you´re going to take risks. Some will work, some won´t. Whether we buy eBay, have some sort of partnership or do something entirely different: If you´re actually trying to build something, you´re going to take risks. And not every swing is going to be a home run. Ever heard of Amazon Auctions or Amazon zShops that launched in 1999? Or that when Steve Jobs left Apple and found NeXT in 1985, the first two computers they launched didn´t sell? There are plenty of examples proving that if you want to be successful, you **have to take some swings. That is part of the game.** The NFT marketplace was a fucking disaster. Powerpacks look really promising. I´ll take a CEO who´s willing to take swings a thousand times over a CEO who would´ve just kept running GameStop the way it was being run before Ryan came in, trying to survive on selling used video games. And here’s the beautiful part: GameStop isn´t trading at the ridiculous valuations it enjoyed a few years ago. So every bit of unnecessary fat Ryan cuts from eBay or any swing Ryan takes that actually hits, has a much better chance of actually lifting our boat this time. And the possibility that this incoming tide finally puts some real, uncontrollable pressure on those dumb fucking stormtroopers and ends up squeezing them slowly and painfully is just the **cherry on top.** We spent years buying a company that was objectively expensive because we believed in what it could become. The funny thing is, this is exactly the kind of price action many of us **have been waiting years for**. A company with solid earnings, a reasonable valuation, revenue growing again for the first time in years, and a management team willing to take aggressive swings to make this company grow, while the market suddenly decides it’s all worth less. Maybe we will take a swing and miss. Or maybe, in a few years, we’ll look back at it as one of the last chances to buy before the tide finally came back in and lifted our boat after years of being stranded on dry land. TLDR: My tits are jacked and i bought more. **Disclaimer:** English isn’t my first language, so I used ChatGPT to help me phrase and proofread this post. The thoughts, opinions, and arguments are my own.
83 comments held Reddit says 1 on reddit ↗
  1. u/Superstonk_QV moderator pinned 1 1 day ago
    Why GME? || What is DRS? || Low karma apes feed the bot here || Superstonk Discord || Community Post: *Open Forum* || Superstonk:Now with GIFs - Learn more ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!
  2. u/Hajime5353 1 1 day ago
    That graph from the SEC is how I sit zen at night k owing one day I will get paid well for HODLing
  3. u/Over-Computer-6464 1 1 day ago
    The OP misrepresented what that graph shows. The volume axis on the left is volume per **1/2 hour period.** What that graph shows is that during the period when the volumes were several times the total number of shares outstanding, that the short closing volume from a select group of short sellers was a small fraction of the total volume. That section of the report was discussing whether or not short closing was the main factor in GME price variations. If you go to the next graph in the report you will see that the SEC says the short interest went from 1.09 times the total outstanding shares count down to less than 0.25 times the outstanding share count in January. That was in a period where in just one week the number of shares traded exceeded 14 times the total outstanding sharecount. Short closing volume was less than 0.85/14=6% of the trade volume.
  4. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 1 day ago
    The point i was trying to make is that the short seller buying volume was not nearly enough to close a massive short position and this is without counting in the new shorts. But it’s only fair to mention that they havent included all short sellers when compiling that graph. I‘m pretty smooth myself, could you elaborate how i misrepresented it?
  5. u/Over-Computer-6464 1 1 day ago
    The short interest was just over the total outstanding sharecount. In the last week of January there were three days where the daily trade volume exceeded 3 times the daily sharecount. You made the claim that the "SEC showing there wasn’t anywhere near enough short seller buying volume during the sneeze for that to have happened". The blue-green graph is the total volume. We know that the graph is for the week where the daily trade volumes were many multiples of the total number of outstanding shares. The X-axis is millions of shares per 30 minute period. If you integrate the area under the curves you will see that there was indeed far more than enough volume for the shorts to have closed. The SEC clearly showed that in the adjacent graph, which directly plotted the short interest. That graph the SEC unambiguously shows short interest dropping from 109% on 12/31/2025 to mid-20% on 1/31/2021. https://preview.redd.it/whpme7d1nsih1.jpe…
  6. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 1 day ago
    Short interest has fallen significantly, yes. But the point I was making with the graph I showed is that this exact figure is fishy. For one, because it’s self-reported, and secondly because, in my opinion, the graph I showed doesn’t indicate that the necessary volume was there. Overall, there was enough volume during that period for shorts to cover, yes. But that doesn’t account for the new short positions and the data suggests that they didnt close. And the S3 data from back then raises the question of how such a reduction in shorts is even possible. I think the “The Smoking Gun” DD explains this pretty well: „Look at all of the dates between 1/19/2021 and 1/29/2021... remember what Ihor said about this time frame? ...we dropped from around 140% to 113%... as of 1/29/2021, Ihor said the ACTUAL short interest was 113%.... that's BEFORE using S3's new SI% calculation..... Now go back to the red bars...... assuming 140% was the high... you mean to tell me that ALL of that buying was only a 27% reduction... (let me double check my maff.... 140 - 113... yup... 27%) in the outstanding short interest?.... Did they cover after the price dropped while the buy button was disabled? IDFK, you tell me... does it look like there was much activity from short sellers covering after 1/29/2021? To me, it looks like these mother f\*ckers spent money trying to gaslight the population and hope we washed our hands of it....“
  7. u/Over-Computer-6464 1 23 hours ago
    You keep repeating things that are popular memes, but are untrue. Short interest is not self reported. Changes in how S3 manipulated the reported short interest (reported in shares, not percentages) has no effect on short interest. I have no ideal who lhor is. The numbers he reports are not the actual short interest. My comment is to note that the SEC did not say what you claimed, and the graph does not support your claims.
  8. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 23 hours ago
    Official short interest is based on **broker-dealer-reported positions** S3 Partners is a financial data/analytics firm, and Ihor Dusaniwsky was one of the main S3 analysts covering GME’s short interest in 2021. Their estimates and methodology were separate from the official FINRA short-interest figures. That’s also why S3 Partners is relevant here. S3 provides **daily short-interest estimates**, including for GME, rather than relying solely on the twice-monthly FINRA data. I’m **not claiming that the SEC said the shorts were not closed**. I’m saying that the SEC report contributed an important piece of the puzzle, while the official short-interest data only gives us snapshots of reported positions. The SEC report, the trading volume, and the other data points together are what raise the questions I’m referring to. The SEC itself has acknowledged the difficulty of getting visibility into **security-based swaps**, including total return swaps, and introduced additional reporting requirements in response to those issues. I’m not claiming that this proves GME shorts were hidden through swaps; I’m saying that the official short-interest figure does not necessarily capture every form of economic short exposure.
  9. u/Over-Computer-6464 1 22 hours ago
    So you now agree that short interest is reported by broker-dealers and are not self-reported. Good. You were not discussing swaps or any other private contracts. Of course short interest figures do not reflect swaps. They also do not reflect side bets I have made with my friends. None of that is relevant to your claim that "short seller buying volume was not nearly enough to close a massive short position".
  10. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 22 hours ago
    When I said “self-reported,” I meant that FINRA does not independently measure every broker’s positions. FINRA relies on others, broker-dealers, to report their positions accurately and it matters because reporting errors do happen. But i‘m glad that we apparently meant the same thing. The swaps point was relevant because you used the reported SI graph as evidence that the shorts were closed. My point was simply that the reported SI figure shouldn’t be treated as an infallible measure of total economic short exposure, which is why I brought up S3 and the SEC’s discussion of swaps.
  11. u/Noderpsy 1 23 hours ago
    I'd be more inclined to believe this narrative, had there not been explosive price action months later for no apparent reason whatsoever... You think DFV stuck around as long as he did for a fundamentals play?
  12. u/VelvetPancakes 1 22 hours ago
    Thats because the naked short prime brokers absorbed large short positions from hedge funds and promptly hid that short interest and PCO’d the stock via their discretionary input to the NSCC proprietary black-box algorithm for VaR and ECP
  13. u/Over-Computer-6464 1 22 hours ago
    That is an interesting conspiracy theory, Unfortunately Robinhood acknowledged publicly that the VaR and ECP were completely spelled out on the NSCCC rules on collateral, but that Robinhood simply never included the ECP in their risk management calculations,
  14. u/VelvetPancakes 1 22 hours ago
    First, Robinhood wasn’t the only broker subject to restrictions. Second, the output of VaR and ECP are spelled out but not the inputs, one part of which is entirely discretionary by the NSCC.
  15. u/VorpalBlade- 1 1 day ago
    Ryan’s not oblivious to the reality of the short sellers. He’s taken multiple opportunities to shit talk them and tell us that he sees us and that he’s on our side against them. I agree he’s done a great job turning it around and it’s not possible for him to deliberately trigger a short squeeze because they would Sue him to oblivion. But think he’s attempting something that’s never been done before. I’m going To be patient and see what he can do
  16. u/4cranch 1 1 day ago
    i mean we can all throw him a billy if he gets sued.... since we'll have infinity
  17. u/F1nnycar 1 1 day ago
    I mean.
  18. u/lalich 1 20 hours ago
    This homie maths ! 🧮
  19. u/Ack_Pfft 1 23 hours ago
    Also Apes aren’t oblivious to all the FUD around here. HODL
  20. u/VelvetPancakes 1 22 hours ago
    Of course he isn’t oblivious, he is bailing them out. He has diluted hundreds of millions of shares around $20, or 40% of the price of the prior 2021 offerings and below the average purchase price of anyone who has been DCA’ing over the last half decade. I’ve been extremely patient, but it is starting to look like he got bought off to fuck us over
  21. u/wywyknig 1 18 hours ago
    The best way to squeeze out shorts is to grow revenue and profit.
  22. u/humdingler 1 1 day ago
    The price action I’m waiting for is for it to go way up and down over and over with a lot of little jumps up and down before the spikes, in the style of an atrial fribrillation rhythm craving some of that volatility
  23. u/DeepApeValuee 1 1 day ago
    Well said, same boat as you! Of course it hurts seeing it dip, but we are at the best place since going public with gme! Lets see where this takes us!
  24. u/TOM_PE13 1 1 day ago
    I might be smooth, but I'm not thaaat smooth.
  25. u/Conor_Electric 1 1 day ago
    I'm with you dude, your words match my sentiment very well. Except I don't agree we were overvalued. Always lots of potential in the future!
  26. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 23 hours ago
    I‘d say that if you just go for fundamentals, we were overvalued with our revenue and operating losses. But if you count in Ryan and his potential value to the company, then it‘s hard to say. But soon the price will be carried by fundamentals if we manage to improve from here is what i tried to say.
  27. u/ToughHardware 1 23 hours ago
    but like, why still flat? stonk goes up and right, right?
  28. u/Kiwi-Kreeper 1 19 hours ago
    Love this!!!
  29. u/[deleted] 1 21 hours ago

    [removed] — already gone when the archive first saw it

  30. u/Expensive_SCOLLI2 1 1 day ago
    Good read and it's how I feel as well. Take my upvote!
  31. u/wenchanger 1 1 day ago
    In RC we trust.
  32. u/Ok_Vast_8918 1 1 day ago
    Averaged down from $23.50 to 22.90 just in the last two days 😂 young apeling here but I currently own 1100 stonks at this average 🔥💥🍻
  33. u/DJchalupaBatman 1 1 day ago
    It would just be nice for all the improvements Cohen has made to the company’s health to actually be reflected in the stock price, that’s all I’m saying. I don’t really give a shit if it’s the healthiest company in the world if my investment has still lost money due to all the dilution and what not. I get that early on it was a great idea and totally necessary for the company to survive, but the stuff over the past couple of years, especially during RK’s return, felt like a slap in the face. Don’t get me wrong, I hope Cohen has some great plan and executes it to perfection and makes the company super profitable. But sometimes it feels like he doesn’t really care about the shareholders (or money, cause he’s already rich AF), he just cares about trying to build something. And I’m not here to be a fanboy of him or the company, I’m here to make some money.
  34. u/Snort_Lupulin69 1 1 day ago
    Sounds emotional
  35. u/Slab00 1 23 hours ago
    He is literally the biggest share holder
  36. u/DJchalupaBatman 1 21 hours ago
    Yeah that’s kind of my point. Even though he owns a ton of shares he doesn’t seem to care about the price, cause even without his GME he would still be a billionaire. He just cares about his long term vision and building his legacy, not enriching the GME shareholders. At least, that’s how it feels lately.
  37. u/Slab00 1 21 hours ago
    So your theory is he doesn't care at all about his billion dollars?
  38. u/I_DO_ANIMAL_THINGS 1 1 day ago
    Penis
  39. u/humdingler 1 1 day ago
    ![gif](giphy|1guRIRW8QdSte01T6Du)
  40. u/FishAye5 1 1 day ago
    Dick
  41. u/I_DO_ANIMAL_THINGS 1 1 day ago
    Richard
  42. u/The_Real_King713 1 1 day ago
    Piece of shit stock. I have lost everything I owned betting on this shit, I am forced to hold....
  43. u/ronk99 1 1 day ago
    Lol. The only way you could have “lost everything you owned” is if you bought every top and sold every bottom or you just yolod all in in options. Wtf did you do?
  44. u/The_Real_King713 1 1 day ago
    I have held shares and warrants now that are well over 50% down. Has emergency vet bill so I had to sell at these lows to cover it. I still own thousands of shares but like I said I'm down 50%.... shit sucks and honestly I'm over it now.
  45. u/ronk99 1 1 day ago
    50% down and thousands of shares vs “lost everything i owned”… you see that yourself no? I get that your situation is frustrating but thats just sooo over exaggerated.
  46. u/Snort_Lupulin69 1 1 day ago
    “I still hold $30k in shares but I’ve also lost everything I’ve ever owned!”
  47. u/The_Real_King713 1 1 day ago
    You get it, I have sold but I'm down over $100,000 and then this guy just calls me a shill because I'm upset at this bull
  48. u/Bit-corn 1 1 day ago
    He frequents the m.e.l.t. subreddit. He’s not here to do anything but complain and spread negativity
  49. u/The_Real_King713 1 1 day ago
    This is my biggest thing with this sub. I have to just be happy all the time, if I did believe in this play I would not have bacame an investor. But if I don't fall in line with the cult thinking then I'm a shill? I put my money where my mouth is and when this investment has literally cost my over $100,000 of my own money over the past 5 years I am not allowed to be upset? This place has become an echo chamber. I will keep holding, cause I have hope. But that does not mean I have to smile while I get shit on.
  50. u/TowelFine6933 1 1 day ago
  51. u/The_Real_King713 1 1 day ago
    Hopefully that will be us soon
  52. u/TowelFine6933 1 1 day ago
    That's me already. I'm in the red, but still chill. 🤷‍♂️
  53. u/ronk99 1 1 day ago
    But you get that your overdramatic language kinda adds a lot to the drama, no?
  54. u/The_Real_King713 1 21 hours ago
    Yeah... your right
  55. u/Bit-corn 1 1 day ago
    You don’t have to be happy all the time lol If you are going to post a critical comment, at least add a little substance to it What was the purpose of your original comment besides whining about a poor financial decision you made?
  56. u/The_Real_King713 1 23 hours ago
    I'm frustrated that was the purpose. Now I know that you are the type of person who would ask for another punch in the nuts after the first 500 in the last 5 years. If I did not have any skin in the game then yeah I get why I should shut up, but I have 2500 shares and over 4000 warrants. And guess what I've done in the past 5 years. Average down, but what happens when the price just keep dropping and dropping and dropping. And when I express my frustration as a dedicated investor cause I'm not screaming how happy I am to get shit on. This is the reason people think this sub is a cult you only want to hear the good and never the bad.
  57. u/Bit-corn 1 22 hours ago
    I have more skin in the game than you. At one point, I had six figures of unrealized profit and now I’m sitting at a substantial loss. Am I frustrated with myself for not realizing some profit? Yes. Am I on here complaining about something I can’t change? No. Why? Because I knew the risks of holding a very volatile stock that is a heavily manipulated I never said anything about only wanting to hear the good news. I said your comment provided zero value besides whining. “And when I express my frustration as a dedicated investor cause I’m not screaming how happy I am to get shit on” lmao….Take your martyrdom somewhere else, man
  58. u/The_Real_King713 1 21 hours ago
    You can't control me, I'll say what I want as much as I want. See you in the moon, ape.
  59. u/Bit-corn 1 21 hours ago
    I’m not trying to, I’m saying that it’s not a cult here just because people don’t want to see your pointless negative comments Later, pal
  60. u/Slab00 1 23 hours ago
    You're just a big baby take some accountability for your actions. Did you think gme was a 100% safe bet? How does someone so dumb even accrue the wealth you have?
  61. u/Bit-corn 1 1 day ago
    It’s almost like you should have an emergency fund and then set aside a portion of your remaining discretionary income for investments instead of going all in into a high risk stock
  62. u/FishAye5 1 1 day ago
    Now we can has prophet?
  63. u/RevXaos 1 1 day ago
    Well said, fellow ape. I wholeheartedly agree.
  64. u/Snort_Lupulin69 1 1 day ago
    Straight facts homie. I agree with literally everything you said. Rational and regarded at the same time. I’m betting on GME and RC and the internet.
  65. u/[deleted] 1 1 day ago

    [removed] — already gone when the archive first saw it

  66. u/Odinthedoge 1 1 day ago
    Nothing someone says before the word but, really counts.
  67. u/Bloodybottoms215 1 1 day ago
    How about they keep telling us to forget GameStop but they can’t themselves 😂
  68. u/marcus-87 1 1 day ago
    I just keep buying more. With any luck my big end of year bonus can still buy me reasonably cheap shares 😬
  69. u/WolfOfLOLStreet 1 23 hours ago
    Preach the gospel!
  70. u/Shwiftygains 1 23 hours ago
    Enjoying the comment section. Reassures me that the ppl who were truly here from the beginning, truly outraged, cheated, tested and struggled through the growing pains of GME from 2021 Feel like this sub has been contaminated beyond hope. Except for when GME runs like it did when RK returned briefly🥲 I'm convinced those who have been here since the start stopped relying and depending on this sub  Shorts still havent closed, GameStop is better than ever, I'm still hodling, buying, and shopping the company. I just like the stock
  71. u/Itsjustmerk 1 17 hours ago
    \*Zen\*
  72. u/Hedkandi1210 1 12 hours ago
    As
  73. u/sosawof 1 23 hours ago
    Love this write up. I’ve been feeling annoyed with GME lately but I plan on buying more tomorrow after this. What are your thoughts on the warrants? I find it weird he did choose to dilute right before warrants expire.
  74. u/LittleThiccRedLuigi OP 1 22 hours ago
    i dont have a strong opinion on warrants, but i‘d be surprised if they‘d expire in the money.
  75. u/Specialist-West-1911 1 22 hours ago
    Cool....can I have some fucking money now?
  76. u/thechonkiestchonk 1 22 hours ago
    Tldr stock continues to drop making my account more red than before
  77. u/HashtagYoMamma 1 22 hours ago
    Blah blah blah… plant information to justify the highly manipulated shareprice and try to normalise people thinking it’s acceptable despite the stick dropped repeatedly on good news… …blah blah blah.
  78. u/[deleted] 1 22 hours ago

    [deleted] — already gone when the archive first saw it

  79. u/Mammoth-Ad2115 1 21 hours ago
    I just started writing puts so I don’t miss any sweet discounts. Hard not buy more right now with that locked up capital though. You don’t know until you know I guess…
  80. u/Rejectbaby 1 20 hours ago
    You assume that companies are valued at some sort of fair value, they most definitely are not. Companies are based on speculation, not fundamentals. A company can be profitable and still take a stock loss. It has never been about fundamentals and never will be, especially with GME. Most people here are mad because we have never received a concrete plan as to what to expect. There is bullshit talk about investor delight but the stock is diluted the second it has any meaningful action. And YES, they can wait for the needle to move up significantly before diluting because it’ll also increase their cash flow as well. It’s obviously designed to protect some industry insiders who are short, that explains the absurd timing of the dilutions. He can let it run just a little to let the little guys take a small profit , but no! I also remember all the other failed attempts, remember loopring? nFts? So on and so on. The truth of the matter is that he’s stuck and doesn’t know what to do. I’m invested to the bitter end so I’ll be here, but I didn’t sign up to be in a cult. I wanted financial change and a better life for the little guy. That is all.
  81. u/lalich 1 20 hours ago
    ♾️🏴‍☠️🤙
  82. u/crazyPickle16 1 17 hours ago
    Conspiracy theorists are batting a 1000, Buy more it’s cheap…. For now
  83. u/Hedkandi1210 1 12 hours ago
    Great post op